version “7g” of the text (I coat and increased) of the video that is in youtube in this link
_____________________________________________________________________________
Another FITNA islam on it.
____________________________________
Using to advantage the natural curiosity, we join here some information, discoveries and analyses.
It can have errors, imperfections and omissions. It has in the Internet much space to be pronounced. _______________________________________
What he was they islam it?
A system of being able personal and ditatorial of proper muhammad.
Which was the first order of muhammad?
That the people if submit it, said what said and made what it made, much before kuran being known and to be complete.
Around this idea base she is that its power was constructed.
What she made muhammad?
She used allah as excuse and she annulled and she destroyed all the other previous and posterior espiritualidades.
In the practical one she wanted to destroy the whole world good spiritual.
- The holy ghost Bom or Espirito Santo of the religious ones
- E common-sense or reason of the atheists.
They islam it was based on kuran?
Not.
It was not based on kuran.
It was not based on sunna.
It was not based on would sharia.
Kuran was only compiled after muhammad dying.
Sunna would sharia and it much later.
They islam it was based on the personal power of muhammad, in what it said, it made and it wanted, much before kuran existing.
E is Islamismo?
Not.
It is same maometismo, therefore everything is based on what muhammad said and made e, on kuran muhammad even gave to indications allah.
E, never before the religion if called islam.
Never before God was called allah.
allah is God?
Not.
The God of the Christians, the God of the Jews, the God of zoroatras, etc… already in the height were defined, and the characteristics of allah are different and until opposing to the same ones.
The islamismo is the continuation of the Christianity?
Not.
The behavior of the immediate followers of muhammad was different of the behavior of the immediate followers of Christ.
Therefore the message of muhammad nothing has to see with the original message of Christ and until she is contrary to the same one.
Kuran is the word of allah?
Not.
allah did not write, did not dictate, did not verify nor signed kuran. It does not have credíveis witnesses of this.
E muhammad also did not write, did not organize, not commanded, it did not verify and nor signed kuran?
If the answers are negative, want to say that nor one nor another one had respected kuran, because they could have done everything that and they had not made it.
- But in the Bible, God also did not make it.
In the Christianity it has a message spiritual, that is, information stops beyond what it is written through the share of the Espirito Santo.
E if muhammad among others wanted that all the text was unbroken must have learned, things, to read, to write, to count to calculate and to organize.
Kuran is unbroken?
Not.
Time of califas was compiled no longer.
Califas was who more knew of the islamismo, was the heads of the believers.
Califas had not dictated kuran, had not written it, had not verified it, had signed nor it.
They had asked for to others with little powers and knowledge that made this service.
It has plus another argument.
The women of proper muhammad, had been the people Muslimer than she had. Already they had created conflicts and wars.
E had been defeated. Then the version most faithful of the islamismo was fought and defeated for the proper Muslen.
Also the numeration and the vowels had been added and all the original writings of the time of muhammad had been destroyed by the Muslen most important.
Therefore and also based in these arguments, the current version of kuran is surely a corrupted version.
It has science in kuran?
Not.
Among others things, allah wise person not to read, nor to write, nor to organize, nor to command, nor to calculate, nor to count.
Because if wise person and did not teach muhammad, then the conclusion still is worse.
The images of muhammad are an insult?
That if it knows not. Proper kuran does not forbid images of muhammad. They say that only sunna, but if was used for idolatria.
The caricatures do not serve for idolatria.
It has great insults islam to it?
It has. They are made and used by the proper Muslen without if giving account of this.
Who more insulted muhammad?
allah. Among others things, delayed 20 years supposedly to dictate it a book and it did not teach it nor to read nor to write.
Who more insulted allah?
muhammad. Among others things, called it ignorant, incapable, inefficacious, imcompetent person and brutamontes. Some important occasions, muhammad did not trust nor the Muslen, nor kuran, nor Gibril nor allah for nothing nor thing some.
They also islam it is the auto insultável. If to say what muhammad said, it made and it wanted, already it we are to insult. The same for the been deceptive ones for it. The been deceptive ones for muhammad, little or nothing know of kuran, but when it is for creating problems, everything serves. Nor that it is with things to insult allah. In truth and already with muhammad. allah was better served when he was traído. allah was better adored when he was insulted. When they use the word God instead of the word allah, are to trair allah. That is plus an example of that allah better is served when he is traído muhammad needed 50 years to have emotional maturity to marry a child of 6 years. The child of 6 years, had immediate emotional maturity. With this the child demonstrated to have more and better capacities that proper muhammad.
Any child whom she knows to read and to write already is to insult muhammad and allah. She demonstrates to have more capacities of what they.
If the women had shown to have more emotional, sexual and civic maturity that the men and that until proper muhammad, then califas, sheiks, imames, Ayatolas and that such had to be alone women.
If allah does not have sex then the attributes of allah also had to be feminine.
allah is only?
It is. cannot have 2 or more allahs, because it was had would walk in war. In the world of the bad ones it is that all walk in war until is alone one.
This wants to say that allah is of nature spiritual me. Therefore, in the world of allah, that it is the bad world, it is only e alone it can be.
muhammad was messenger of allah?
As allah nor wrote, nor it signed, nor it left possibility of God if to reveal through the human being, then it used bad methods and processes. With this we can until saying that muhammad was messenger of allah, therefore was based on the world bad spiritual.
muhammad was monoteísta?
Not. Among others deuses, adored the god to be able, the god money, the god luxury, the god of the sex, the god of the cruelty and in some important occasions not even it wanted to know of allah.
The maometanos ones go for the paradise?
Not. If allah not accepted others deuses in its world, then also will not accept human beings. But allah is great… to be deceptive.
Also they would not have ways to arrive there. muhammad said that it was back in a horse with wing and that it went up in a rope.
Nobody never saw the horse and the rope, nor it brought was what it was.
muhammad said to be buried capsized for Measures. With this also it wanted to say that the spirit of the follower was in the corpse.
allah was all powerful?
Not. But it had the power to lie. E to lie said that he was all powerful.
If allah was all powerful and everything knew, at the beginning would soon have guided muhammad for Measures. It would not have baralhado the people.
Moreover it would have used better methods and processes.
What it means allahu to akbar?
allah is great. allah is the greater.
But this affirmation is an insult allah.
When we say that an entity is great is to make a comparison and, in a comparison has 2 or more entities.
Soon allah is not only.
When they are oriented for Measures, are oriented for the rock of the Kaba?
They can think that yes, but who will be far, is oriented for Measures.
E in Measures what it is visible of the exterior and accessible is the symbol of the Satan. The rock is inside of kaba, kept and it is not visible of the side of it are.
allah is great… to be deceptive.
Who made the hell?
allah.
Who made the Satan?
allah
Who granted to freedom of movements and share the Satan?
allah.
He was proper muhammad it said that it. Therefore allah is the responsible one for everything what he is bad.
Directamente through the islamismo, indirectamente through others.
allah was exactly worse of what the devil, therefore he was its autorizador creator and.
they islam is peace?
Not. muhammad used a speech and a double language. To seduce it said a thing, but when it had all the power killed innocent and defenseless people cruel. When it is said in peace, is peace for the criteria of muhammad. That is, none. E the test is in the immediate followers who had been the people most following of muhammad, also the proper women.
The same double speech applied in relation to the tolerance, justice, the religions, etc…
For the criteria of muhammad, they were the opposite of what it said.
muhammad said that it would have war until the o end of the times. Therefore who to say they islam that it is peace, also is to insult muhammad.
muhammad also used and justified the double speech for dissimulation.
When muhammad said that it was to please allah, for the will of allah, for pleasure of allah, this means that allah was devoid.
Somebody is only devoid when she is not all powerful one, nor is creative of everything.
When muhammad said to fight itself for allah, this means that allah was weak. So weak that they had that human being to defend it.
muhammad said that section had 100 attributes. For that they are, they are an limited amount. Soon allah was limited. Plus an insult allah.
Kuran is valid?
Not. muhammad said that something was had better kuran would be false. It can until being that it exists, but until today does not know no book worse, and in the height kuran nor book was. Thus, for the criteria of muhammad kuran is even invalid.
In kuran muhammad even said that it did not understand what it said.
What the maometanos had said was reliable?
Not. To make sunna they had congregated 600 a thousand stories of that they had lived at that time, and of the same ones they had only used to advantage 10 a thousand.
E in these still has the forts and the weak ones.
muhammad was democratical?
Not. E says that to compile kuran they had heard the memorizadores, but to choose califas had never made it.
muhammad if did not worry about the followers, senão would have said for califas to be elect for that they knew kuran, and nor this said.
allah already existed before?
Already. The grandfather of muhammad already had in the name the word allah and was politeísta.
muhammad was annihilating?
It was. Deuses had 360 quiet and stopped in It measures and it directamente destroyed 363.
Those and more of the Christians, of the Jews and of the Atheists.
muhammad was cobarde?
It was. Deuses did not destroy these during 10 years when it coexisted them.
But destrui them as soon as it had military force for this.
muhammad was perhaps the person annihilating than it existed. Until the spirit of God it wanted to destroy.
muhammad was racist?
It was. in the paradise it even created different races.
muhammad was esclavagista?
It was. It had slaves and in the other world it even enslaved the espíritos.
A thing is to read the critics, another one is to read proper kuran, sunna and what they argue. It is verified that is very worse of what the critics have said so far.
One knows that the subjects religious spirituals and are vast and complex, but when it is tried to define the indefinível, to fix the infixável, to number the myriad one, to nominate the inominável, to ascend to transcendente, many problems if create, many polémicas if they raise.
Who wants to believe believes everything and plus some thing, devaluating everything what it is not in agreement to its belief and creating myths favorable to the same one. But it is necessary care with the beliefs. allah is great….to be deceptive.
More discovered.
The islamismo is a dictatorship where all want to be dictators.
muhammad little by little transformed the people into monsters.
In the islamismo everything and all insult and have pleasure in this. muhammad and allah had been insulted mutually, knew and had pleasure in this.
muhammad had + of 4 women for reasons politics. Plus an insult allah. It considered the institution superior marriage to kuran.
muhammad gave a bigger part of the booty to the new followers. Pure bribe and plus an insult allah.
It disrespected who following age better and it has more time and, it considered the god superior money to kuran and allah.
muhammad silenced the good the holy ghost all and alone the devil left to speak (to whisper).
In the islamismo, Gods or the good do not disclose themselves in the human being.
In the O human being is not religion source, of politics, of philosophy, nor you are welcome good.
When somebody believes, is because some thing or somebody of the world spiritual says the person to believe.
As muhammad silenced God and alone the devil left to speak, then the been deceptive ones for muhammad are only informed by the devil.
Due to double, triple language, etc… used in kuran and it has confusion of what it is there, has also in kuran arguments enough to condemn proper muhammad and allah to the eighth hell.
muhammad when it put in first place the payment of taxes of what the belief in allah, one more time traiu allah with the god money and insulted allah.
muhammad when it sent a simple letter to the other kings for them if to submit, traiu allah with the god greed and insulted allah for not using kuran to convince these kings. It believed more a simple letter of what in all kuran. The horse did not ask for to go there personally.
It did not ask for allah to send gibril there, nor asked for one any another more efficient and convincing method.
When muhammad said following to pay zacat to them, did not say to be the followers to decide where the money had to be expense.
That is plus one it proves of that in the islamismo God or the good they are not disclosed through the people.
muhammad supposedly said that kuran left and sunna. Kuran already we saw that it was corrupted. To make sunna already we saw that they had used to advantage less than 2% of the stories. If muhammad if had really worried, would have made to write and verified all suuna while he was alive.
It has the curiosity in knowing quanta of sunna and of sira they had been written in the life of it. If nothing, plus a great lack of organization and interest on the part of muhammad in making the well done things. Sira, is some biographies of muhammad.
E how many madrassas had in the time of muhammad? If none, has that to take off conclusions of this.
muhammad said that the Holy Writs had been corrupted. Then muhammad must not have used nor the word islam nor the word allah, therefore these words did not correspond to the original words for religion and God. Were corrupted words.
muhammad said that he was a simple human being. But at the beginning still it distrusted of that it was the Satan that it were to be deceptive.
But who has more power? A human being or the Satan? With certainty that the Satan. Thus and for what proper muhammad said, it was the Satan that continued it to be deceptive.
muhammad said that Christ did not have biological father. If he did not have, then Christ was same son of God.
proper muhammad finished for recognizing that Christ was very superior it.
muhammad spoke of the previous religions, but what now if it knows of histories of the religions not condiz with what muhammad affirmed.
muhammad said that the rock of kaaba was white and later if it became black color. One knows today that this is lie. E that this argument is very seemed one of the arguments of hinduísmo.
An image serves to transmit information. A text also. If the images were an insult, muhammad also represented allah in text. Therefore it insulted also it. muhammad said that only it was descending of Ismael. Pure lie. In the region all were descending of all. Kuran is a list of insults allah. All the vowels are and also the numeration. Tsunami was guilt of allah. The preparation lack was guilt islam of it. If in kuran it is cruelty and if they defend and they justify this literally, then the mosques and madrassas are same cruelty houses. muhammad complained it allah. If it walked to the orders of allah did not have nothing that if to complain. The been deceptive ones for muhammad can islam use it as a species of cultural affirmation. But until this, the cultural affirmations, muhammad forbade, pursued and destroyed. the maometanos like to criticize. This is to give value to criticizes. But muhammad criticizes did not value it, it criticizes and it is healthful to improve itself. The scholars only take off conclusions in the end to finish the studies. But still now they walk to study the islamismo, but already they had had that to very take off conclusions before kuran being complete and to be known. Very possibly, muhammad and the followers ate foods that had been absorbed in alcohol. In the region it had a great cultural wealth, spiritual, philosophical and religious. For pressure politician-military man of the islamismo, the intellectuals, conscientious or unconsciously, had been creating adaptation arguments so that the islamismo was more acceptable. This process still today continues. It has arguments that they are used of which muhammad not even dreamed. But muhammad said that kuran was complete and with this it invalidated and any posterior argument all. These arguments, in the practical one, are more insults muhammad and allah.
The islamismo was a method perfected throughout the time for muhammad, that with the excuse of being supposedly religious, went creating problems and arguments in order to assault the power and to justify the barbarities and the nonsenses necessary to this.
The islamismo has a similar behavior to the virus of the been one, deceives and breaks the defenses of the organisms that it desires to attack.
Also it has a similar behavior to the one of the one of the plagues.
It goes for a fruit good, devora it e, to survive has that to jump for another good fruit that she is defenseless.
they islam is pure destruction. Still today all the cultures assaulted and stolen islam for it continue to be destroyed. The Arab, the Persian, the Egyptian, berbere and other more.
Kuran has affirmations corrupted and counterfeited for muhammad that later they had been corrupted and counterfeited for the Muslen most important.
The good is the good and the search of the good they islam it is the evil and the search of the evil
Some of the attributes of allah that they uncover studying what muhammad said and made:
allah the impotent one
allah the ignorant
allah the illiterate
allah brutamontes
allah the liar
allah the insultável
allah the ofendível
allah the acephalous
allah the weak one
allah the attackable one
allah the cruel one
allah the comichoso
allah the devoid one
allah the annihilator
allah the masochist
allah the thief
allah the unjust one
allah the ditadora
allah cobarde
allah the envious one
allah the not-sociable one
allah the autoone
…
Example of what the Muslen think and say.
- The occidental people are useless ones and imcompetent people when they do not defend with firmness the respective physical space and spiritual.
In simple language
allah is thing me.
muhammad said it and proved it. It is all writing. Who to say the opposite is to insult muhammad.
It has more conclusions. It is alone to read what muhammad said and made.
How is possible the good?
With 2 things that muhammad denied.
For the atheists, with common-sense or reason and for religious with more the holy ghost Bom or Espirito Santo de Deus.
_________________________________________________________________________________________________
muhammad = “muhammad” || “muhammad” > maometanos || “they islam” = islam || islamismo = maometismo
______________________________________________________________________________
Had to the actualizações, the present text in:
http://docs.google.com/Doc?id=dfcst2cq_1fz6jzvgx
it can already be different of the text of the video. The added text is the colors.
15 of April of 2008 - Only the text: To see in the fiche of the video where (that he is this)
blog
Sem comentários:
Enviar um comentário